Monday, October 09, 2006

Writing 2.0

Written langauge is one of our most ancient technologies, and I believe it's time for an upgrade. For the last several decades a mysterious fog has surrounded the fairly straightforward process of mastering written language. Loud, bitter debates between practicioners of various systems for training new reader/writers have sprung up and wasted tremendous amounts of time and minds. When you step back from all the arguing and simply look at written language it's a fairly simple system of matching sound to letters. I can hear the rumbling from various camps about that "simplification", but the truth is unavoidable. As a piece of technology, writing is very simple. The difficulties that arise are due to the sentimental accretions we've held on to just because Oxford wrote up a dictionary. It is time to look at our phonetic system and standardize spelling and phonemes. It is time for laugh to become laff, phone/fone, etc.
Children are being confused and overwhelmed at the gateway of education, in order to spare lovers of ancient spellings and those who cannot accept the growing distance between this era and the Elizabethan period. We are wasting precious time on learning ancient phonemes and an unnecessarily confusing phonetic system that is now needed for the greater demands placed on the average mind by our information driven society . I love Shakespeare as much if not more as the next person, but I don't think we should hold our children's progress hostage to his spelling--after all he wasn't overly concerned with consistent spelling himself. We need to simpify written language so that learning to read becomes as easy for children as learning to use a computer or a game system. Written language is just another human technology and we need to give it an upgrade.

3 comments:

Steve Poling said...

Why did you spell laugh with two f's?

If we are to refactor written language, don't stop at spelling, go on to change the alphabet to something that more closely matches phonemes. Thus the spelling would match a phonetic transcription.

Though appealing, this becomes troublesome because some benighted souls live in ballmer merlin. And think of the arguments about the spelling of that red fruit from which catsup is made. Toemaytoe? or is it Toemahtoe?

And why are we speaking English instead of Esperanto? And why are you typing on a QWERTY keyboard instead of DWORAC?

English spelling is like all those things. Imperfect, but unreplaceable.

Christine Ansorge said...

I like your revision of the alphabet suggestion. I make no claims to knowing how we should revise, but I do strongly feel that we should. I guess you have to sit and listen to children struggling through what could be a very simple process in order to appreciate the need. If a child stumbles at the first step in learning to read the consequences carry on throughout their education. The child's need to be able to get to at least an Associate's Degree in order to make a decent living in this day and age mean that we should do everything possible to enable them to do post-highschool work. Easing up the first step into higher thinking is a good thing to do.

Steve Poling said...

Years back when my kids engaged in "creative spelling" while learning to write, I didn't get my knickers in a knot. Jane was a voracious reader who devoured everything in sight. She was so intent upon reading that she could make ANY methodology for teaching reading work. Conversely, Dan was a lot slower at reading and we pulled him out of public school when he was functionally illiterate. Moved him to a Baptist elementary school and they taught him phonics and he is an accomplished reader. (He's not the poet laureate of the Poling clan, but he's always gotten strong A's in English.)

Bottom line: get your kids reading and blow off spelling until they're bit by the reading bug.